An unpaid invoice does not automatically call for the strongest possible letter. Effective B2B debt recovery first establishes whether the monetary claim is due and provable, whether performance is disputed, and which procedure is likely to produce actual payment.
Delay can increase both evidentiary and recovery risk. Before starting proceedings, the contract, performance records, debtor details, limitation period and solvency should be reviewed.
1. Organise the legal basis and evidence
The file will usually include the contract or order, applicable terms, proof of performance, delivery notes, invoices, correspondence and any complaints. An overdue entry in the accounts is not enough on its own: the creditor should be able to prove what was supplied, when and on what terms.
Verify the principal amount, due date, partial payments, set-off or warranty objections, and the basis of interest and ancillary charges. The debtor’s current company name, registered office and registration number should also be checked.
2. When is a demand letter useful?
A proper demand identifies the agreement and invoice, the due date, principal and ancillary claims, gives a short payment deadline, and states the payment method and intended legal next step. It may open the way to settlement, instalments or quick clarification of a genuine dispute.
A demand letter is not a substitute for commencing proceedings. Under the current Civil Code, an ordinary written demand is not listed among the events interrupting limitation. If limitation may be close, immediate case-specific advice is required.
Practical point: a precise attorney’s demand may resolve an undisputed debt owed by a functioning business. If performance is firmly disputed, assets may disappear, insolvency is suspected or limitation is near, immediate procedural action may be appropriate.
3. When is a payment order available?
A Hungarian payment order (FMH) is available only for due monetary claims. Subject to the statutory conditions, it is generally mandatory up to HUF 3 million. Between HUF 3 million and HUF 30 million, the creditor may choose a payment order or litigation. Above HUF 30 million, the claim must be brought directly before a court. The debtor must have a known domestic address for service.
Evidence is generally not attached to the application, but it should already be prepared. If the debtor objects, the matter converts into litigation and the claim must be proven.
4. What happens after service?
The debtor has 15 days from service to pay or object. Without an objection, the payment order becomes final and enforceable. Finality does not itself produce payment: enforcement proceedings may still be required.
A timely objection converts the case into litigation. Following the notary’s notice, the creditor must file the statement of claim and address the court-fee requirements within a short statutory period. The contract, proof of performance and calculation of the claim then become decisive.
5. When is litigation required or preferable?
Claims above HUF 30 million must be commenced in court. A case also moves to court regardless of value when the debtor objects to a payment order. If a complex dispute over performance, quality, damages or set-off is foreseeable, the strategy should be designed from the outset around evidence, cost and litigation risk.
Before filing, consider documentary and witness evidence, whether expert evidence may be required, court fees, the likely duration and whether a favourable judgment can actually be enforced against the debtor.
6. Default interest and recovery-cost flat rate
The Civil Code contains specific default-interest rules for contracts between businesses. The exact calculation depends on the period of delay, the applicable central-bank base rate, the contract and whether the relationship legally qualifies as B2B.
Subject to Act IX of 2016, a creditor business may also claim the HUF equivalent of EUR 40 as a recovery-cost flat rate. This is not the same as actual attorney or enforcement costs, and its availability should be checked for the particular relationship.
7. Limitation: why waiting is risky
The general limitation period for civil claims is normally five years from the due date, but a contract, special legislation or case-specific facts can change the result. Courts and notaries generally do not apply limitation on their own motion; the debtor must invoke it.
Limitation may be interrupted, among other things, by the debtor’s acknowledgement, an agreed modification, settlement, or judicial enforcement ending in a final decision on the merits. The calculation should therefore not be based on the invoice date or demand letters alone.
8. Solvency and enforceability
Even a legally sound claim may not be economically recoverable. Check whether the debtor still trades, files accounts and is subject to enforcement, compulsory strike-off, voluntary liquidation or insolvency proceedings. Insolvency has separate deadlines and rules; liquidation is not merely a stronger demand letter.
An instalment plan or settlement should document acknowledgement of the debt, deadlines, security and the consequence of a missed instalment.
9. A practical decision sequence
- Undisputed and manageable debt: precise demand with a short deadline, followed by a documented settlement if appropriate.
- Due monetary claim up to HUF 3 million: payment order where statutory conditions are met.
- Between HUF 3 million and HUF 30 million: payment order or litigation, depending on dispute and evidence.
- Above HUF 30 million: direct litigation.
- Objection: prepare for court with the complete evidentiary file.
- Insolvency or asset risk: immediate, case-specific strategy.
10. Common mistakes
- Keeping only the invoice and not the evidence of performance.
- Using an incorrect debtor name, legal basis, amount or due date.
- Sending repeated letters without checking limitation.
- Treating an FMH as automatic collection and failing to prepare for an objection.
- Ignoring whether the debtor owns enforceable assets.
- Accepting an oral instalment promise without acknowledgement or security.
Summary
A demand letter, payment order and lawsuit are not universal successive stages. The right choice depends on value, evidence, dispute, limitation and the debtor’s financial position. Early organisation of the file and a consistent procedural strategy usually improve the prospect of actual recovery.
Do you have an overdue B2B claim and want to assess the most effective next step?
Request debt recovery assistance
This article provides general information and is not individual legal advice. Deadlines, costs and procedural requirements must be verified for the specific case.